Contact

Robert K. Colwell

Museum Curator Adjoint in Entomology


Curriculum vitae


robertkcolwell [at] gmail.com


Museum of Natural History

University of Colorado

Boulder, CO 80309, USA




robertkcolwell [at] gmail.com


Museum of Natural History

University of Colorado

Boulder, CO 80309, USA



Managing consequences of climate‐driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science


Journal article


T. Bonebrake, Christopher J. Brown, J. Bell, J. Blanchard, A. Chauvenet, C. Champion, I. Chen, T. Clark, R. K. Colwell, F. Danielsen, A. Dell, J. Donelson, B. Evengård, S. Ferrier, S. Frusher, R. A. Garcia, R. Griffis, A. Hobday, Marta A. Jarzyna, Emma Lee, J. Lenoir, Hlif I. Linnetved, Victoria Y. Martin, Phillipa C. McCormack, J. McDonald, E. McDonald‐Madden, N. Mitchell, T. Mustonen, J. Pandolfi, N. Pettorelli, H. Possingham, P. Pulsifer, M. Reynolds, Brett R. Scheffers, Cascade J. B. Sorte, J. Strugnell, M. Tuanmu, S. Twiname, A. Vergés, Cecilia Villanueva, E. Wapstra, T. Wernberg, G. Pecl
Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Bonebrake, T., Brown, C. J., Bell, J., Blanchard, J., Chauvenet, A., Champion, C., … Pecl, G. (2018). Managing consequences of climate‐driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Bonebrake, T., Christopher J. Brown, J. Bell, J. Blanchard, A. Chauvenet, C. Champion, I. Chen, et al. “Managing Consequences of Climate‐Driven Species Redistribution Requires Integration of Ecology, Conservation and Social Science.” Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (2018).


MLA   Click to copy
Bonebrake, T., et al. “Managing Consequences of Climate‐Driven Species Redistribution Requires Integration of Ecology, Conservation and Social Science.” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{t2018a,
  title = {Managing consequences of climate‐driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society},
  author = {Bonebrake, T. and Brown, Christopher J. and Bell, J. and Blanchard, J. and Chauvenet, A. and Champion, C. and Chen, I. and Clark, T. and Colwell, R. K. and Danielsen, F. and Dell, A. and Donelson, J. and Evengård, B. and Ferrier, S. and Frusher, S. and Garcia, R. A. and Griffis, R. and Hobday, A. and Jarzyna, Marta A. and Lee, Emma and Lenoir, J. and Linnetved, Hlif I. and Martin, Victoria Y. and McCormack, Phillipa C. and McDonald, J. and McDonald‐Madden, E. and Mitchell, N. and Mustonen, T. and Pandolfi, J. and Pettorelli, N. and Possingham, H. and Pulsifer, P. and Reynolds, M. and Scheffers, Brett R. and Sorte, Cascade J. B. and Strugnell, J. and Tuanmu, M. and Twiname, S. and Vergés, A. and Villanueva, Cecilia and Wapstra, E. and Wernberg, T. and Pecl, G.}
}

Abstract

Climate change is driving a pervasive global redistribution of the planet's species. Species redistribution poses new questions for the study of ecosystems, conservation science and human societies that require a coordinated and integrated approach. Here we review recent progress, key gaps and strategic directions in this nascent research area, emphasising emerging themes in species redistribution biology, the importance of understanding underlying drivers and the need to anticipate novel outcomes of changes in species ranges. We highlight that species redistribution has manifest implications across multiple temporal and spatial scales and from genes to ecosystems. Understanding range shifts from ecological, physiological, genetic and biogeographical perspectives is essential for informing changing paradigms in conservation science and for designing conservation strategies that incorporate changing population connectivity and advance adaptation to climate change. Species redistributions present challenges for human well‐being, environmental management and sustainable development. By synthesising recent approaches, theories and tools, our review establishes an interdisciplinary foundation for the development of future research on species redistribution. Specifically, we demonstrate how ecological, conservation and social research on species redistribution can best be achieved by working across disciplinary boundaries to develop and implement solutions to climate change challenges. Future studies should therefore integrate existing and complementary scientific frameworks while incorporating social science and human‐centred approaches. Finally, we emphasise that the best science will not be useful unless more scientists engage with managers, policy makers and the public to develop responsible and socially acceptable options for the global challenges arising from species redistributions.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in